Benchmarking Two Chemical Networks used in General Circulation Models of Hot Jupiters
D. A. Christie, M. Zamyatina, E. H\'ebrard, T. M. Evans-Soma, N. J. Mayne, E. K. H. Lee, S.-M. Tsai, D. E. Sergeev, R. Veillet, and K. Kohary

TL;DR
This study compares two chemical networks used in hot Jupiter GCMs, revealing how numerical criteria and reaction rates influence predicted molecular abundances and emphasizing the need for better reaction data.
Contribution
It provides a benchmark between a reduced and an effective chemical network in hot Jupiter GCMs, highlighting the impact of numerical and chemical rate choices on model predictions.
Findings
Numerical escape criteria cause artificial quenching and overestimate certain molecules.
Disabling the escape criterion improves agreement between networks.
Reaction rate choices significantly affect predicted abundances of key molecules.
Abstract
Chemical kinetics is becoming an increasingly vital component of hot Jupiter general circulation models (GCMs). Here we simulate the hot Jupiter WASP-96b using two chemical networks, a reduced chemical network frequently used in the GCM literature (which we refer to as V19) and a more recent effective network making use of tables of net reactions (MiniCHEM), coupled to the same GCM in order to provide a robust benchmark. We find a numerical escape criterion used by the Unified Model chemical kinetics solver to stop integration for the duration of the chemical timestep, independent of the chemical network, results in artificial quenching, overestimating of HCN, CH, and NH abundances by factors of 1.5 to 3. With this criterion disabled, agreement between the two networks is improved, except for HCN and NH, where different reaction rates and included species results in lower…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
