A Game Theoretic Approach for Optimizing Quantum Error Budget Distribution
Asif Akhtab Ronggon, Tasnuva Farheen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a game-theoretic method to optimize error budget distribution in quantum computing, significantly reducing physical resource needs compared to traditional uniform allocation.
Contribution
It formulates error budget allocation as a potential game and develops an IBR algorithm that achieves Pareto-optimal distribution, improving resource efficiency.
Findings
Average 30.22% reduction in resource requirements across benchmarks.
Peak 97.81% resource savings for specific circuits.
Demonstrates the effectiveness of game theory in quantum error management.
Abstract
Current fault-tolerant quantum compilers allocate error budgets uniformly during resource estimation, causing suboptimal physical resource overhead. We optimize this allocation using a potential game formulation, where Nash Equilibrium yields a Pareto-optimal distribution across logical operations, T-state distillation, and rotation synthesis. An iterated best response (IBR) algorithm converges to this equilibrium through monotonic descent of the shared cost function. Evaluation across 433 MQT benchmarks demonstrates an average reduction of 30.22\% in physical resource requirements relative to uniform baselines, with peak improvements of 97.81\% for specific circuit instances. This establishes a game-theoretic foundation for strategic error budget optimization in fault-tolerant quantum design automation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
