TL;DR
This paper analyzes when trajectory data improves parameter identifiability in stochastic diffusion models, showing that combining count and trajectory data enhances inference and experimental design.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework combining simulations, PDEs, and likelihood methods to assess data types' impact on model parameter identifiability.
Findings
Count data alone can cause structural non-identifiability issues.
Trajectory data can alleviate non-identifiability in diffusion models.
Different data collection protocols influence the precision of parameter inference.
Abstract
Stochastic models of diffusion are routinely used to study dispersal of populations, including populations of animals, plants, seeds and cells. Advances in imaging and field measurement technologies mean that data are often collected across a range of scales, including count data collected across a series of fixed sampling regions to characterize population-level dispersal, as well as individual trajectory data to examine at the motion of individuals within a diffusive population. In this work we consider a lattice-based random walk model and examine the extent to which model parameters can be determined by collecting count data and/or trajectory data. Our analysis combines agent-based stochastic simulations, mean-field partial differential equation approximations, likelihood-based estimation, identifiability analysis, and model-based prediction. These combined tools reveal that working…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
