AD4AD: Benchmarking Visual Anomaly Detection Models for Safer Autonomous Driving
Fabrizio Genilotti, Arianna Stropeni, Gionata Grotto, Francesco Borsatti, Manuel Barusco, Davide Dalle Pezze, Gian Antonio Susto

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks various visual anomaly detection models for autonomous driving, demonstrating their effectiveness in identifying unfamiliar objects and hazards to enhance safety.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive benchmark of eight state-of-the-art VAD methods on a large synthetic dataset, evaluating their performance across different architectures for autonomous driving safety.
Findings
Tiny-Dinomaly offers the best accuracy-efficiency balance for edge deployment.
VAD models transfer effectively to real road scenes.
Pixel-level anomaly maps aid in hazard localization without prior hazard assumptions.
Abstract
The reliability of a machine vision system for autonomous driving depends heavily on its training data distribution. When a vehicle encounters significantly different conditions, such as atypical obstacles, its perceptual capabilities can degrade substantially. Unlike many domains where errors carry limited consequences, failures in autonomous driving translate directly into physical risk for passengers, pedestrians, and other road users. To address this challenge, we explore Visual Anomaly Detection (VAD) as a solution. VAD enables the identification of anomalous objects not present during training, allowing the system to alert the driver when an unfamiliar situation is detected. Crucially, VAD models produce pixel-level anomaly maps that can guide driver attention to specific regions of concern without requiring any prior assumptions about the nature or form of the hazard. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
