On the robustness of Mann-Kendall tests used to forecast critical transitions
Tristan Gamot, Nils Thibeau--Sutre, Tom J.M. Van Dooren

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the use of Mann-Kendall tests for detecting trends in time series related to critical transitions, revealing significant inaccuracies and recommending alternative approaches.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the limitations of Mann-Kendall tests in forecasting critical transitions and suggests avoiding their use in this context.
Findings
Mann-Kendall tests often produce inflated false positive rates in critical transition detection.
Empirical distributions of the Mann-Kendall statistic do not match theoretical assumptions.
Using Mann-Kendall tests can lead to false alarms of critical transitions.
Abstract
Non-parametric approaches to test for trends in time series make use of the Mann-Kendall statistic. Based on asymptotic arguments, these tests assume that its distribution follows a Gaussian distribution, even for autocorrelated time series. Recent results on the lack of validity of this assumption urge a robustness analysis of these approaches. While the issue is relevant across a wide range of applications, we illustrate it here in the context of detecting early warning signals (EWS) of critical transitions, which are used across a variety of research domains, and where commonly applied methods generate autocorrelation. We present a broad analysis, covering all types of critical transitions commonly investigated in EWS studies. We compare empirical distributions of the Mann-Kendall statistic computed from classical EWS indicators preceding critical transitions to the theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
