Complexity of Fungal Automaton Prediction
Enrico Formenti, Eric Goles, K\'evin Perrot, Mart\'in R\'ios-Wilson, Domingo Ruiz-Tala

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of predicting behaviors in fungal automata, revealing efficient predictability in most cases but proving P-completeness for certain rules at radius 1.5.
Contribution
It characterizes the complexity of all fungal automata rules of radius 1, identifying cases that are efficiently predictable and proving P-completeness for the freezing majority rule at radius 1.5.
Findings
Most fungal automata rules are predictably in non-deterministic logspace.
The freezing majority rule at radius 1.5 is P-complete to predict.
A non-linear rule remains open for complexity characterization.
Abstract
Fungal automata are a nature-inspired computational model, where a rule is alternatively applied verticaly and horizontaly. In this work we study the computational complexity of predicting the dynamics of all fungal freezing totalistic one-dimentional rules of radius , exhibiting various behaviors. Despite efficiently predictable in most cases (with non-deterministic logspace algorithms), a non-linear rule is left open to characterize. We further explore the freezing majority rule (which is totalistic), and prove that at radius it becomes -complete to predict.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
