The Fourth Challenge on Image Super-Resolution ($\times$4) at NTIRE 2026: Benchmark Results and Method Overview
Zheng Chen, Kai Liu, Jingkai Wang, Xianglong Yan, Jianze Li, Ziqing Zhang, Jue Gong, Jiatong Li, Lei Sun, Xiaoyang Liu, Radu Timofte, Yulun Zhang, Jihye Park, Yoonjin Im, Hyungju Chun, Hyunhee Park, MinKyu Park, Zheng Xie, Xiangyu Kong, Weijun Yuan, Zhan Li, Qiurong Song

TL;DR
The NTIRE 2026 challenge on image super-resolution ($\times$4) at CVPR 2026 benchmarks recent methods, introduces two evaluation tracks, and analyzes participant solutions to advance the field.
Contribution
This paper presents the design, datasets, evaluation protocols, and results of the NTIRE 2026 super-resolution challenge, highlighting recent advances and future directions.
Findings
194 participants registered, 31 teams submitted entries
Two evaluation tracks: fidelity (PSNR) and perceptual quality
Summarizes top methods and challenge insights
Abstract
This paper presents the NTIRE 2026 image super-resolution (4) challenge, one of the associated competitions of the NTIRE 2026 Workshop at CVPR 2026. The challenge aims to reconstruct high-resolution (HR) images from low-resolution (LR) inputs generated through bicubic downsampling with a 4 scaling factor. The objective is to develop effective super-resolution solutions and analyze recent advances in the field. To reflect the evolving objectives of image super-resolution, the challenge includes two tracks: (1) a restoration track, which emphasizes pixel-wise fidelity and ranks submissions based on PSNR; and (2) a perceptual track, which focuses on visual realism and evaluates results using a perceptual score. A total of 194 participants registered for the challenge, with 31 teams submitting valid entries. This report summarizes the challenge design, datasets, evaluation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
