Bias in Surface Electromyography Features across a Demographically Diverse Cohort
Aditi Agrawal, Celine John Philip, Giancarlo K. Sagastume, Marcus A. Battraw, Wilsaan M. Joiner, Jonathon S. Schofield, Lee M. Miller, Richard S. Whittle

TL;DR
This study investigates how demographic factors like age and BMI influence surface electromyography features, revealing that a significant portion of features vary with demographics, impacting the fairness of neural interfaces.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of demographic effects on sEMG features, highlighting the need for bias mitigation in neural interface development.
Findings
33% of common sEMG features are significantly associated with demographic variables.
Demographic factors such as age, sex, and body composition influence sEMG signal characteristics.
Results can inform the design of more equitable and personalized neural interface systems.
Abstract
Neuromotor decoding from upper-limb electromyography (sEMG) can enhance human-machine interfaces and offer a more natural means of controlling prosthetic limbs, virtual reality, and household electronics. Unfortunately, current sEMG technology does not always perform consistently across users because individual differences such as age and body mass index, among many others, can substantially alter signal quality. This variability makes sEMG characteristics highly idiosyncratic, often necessitating laborious personalization and iterative tuning to achieve reliable performance. This variability has particular import for sEMG-based assistive devices and neural interfaces, where demographic biases in sEMG features could undermine broad and fair deployment. In this study, we explore how demographic differences affect the sEMG signals produced and their implications for machine…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
