Topologically non-trivial gap function and topology-induced time-reversal symmetry breaking in a superconductor with singular dynamical interaction
Yue Yu, Andrey V. Chubukov

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in certain strongly correlated systems with singular interactions, a topologically nontrivial superconducting gap can be energetically favored, leading to a phase with broken time-reversal symmetry.
Contribution
It introduces a model where a topologically nontrivial gap state becomes energetically favorable due to a finite cutoff in a singular dynamical interaction.
Findings
A topologically nontrivial gap state can be stabilized in a model with singular interactions.
The transition between trivial and nontrivial states involves an intermediate phase with broken time-reversal symmetry.
The model highlights the role of a finite cutoff in selecting topologically distinct superconducting states.
Abstract
In many strongly correlated electron systems, non-Fermi liquid behavior and unconventional superconductivity can be viewed as emerging from an effective 4-fermion interaction with a singular frequency dependence. A pairing instability in such a system is qualitatively different from that in a Fermi liquid and generally gives rise to multiple pairing states with topologically distinct gap functions. However, in the systems studied so far, a topologically trivial solution has the lowest energy. Here we show that a repulsive Hubbard-type interaction with a finite cutoff added to a model with a singular dynamical interaction selects, in some parameter range, the theretofore subleading, topologically nontrivial solution. We consider a minimal model that displays this behavior and show that the transformation between the topologically trivial and nontrivial gap functions necessarily occurs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
