The Epidemiology of Artificial Intelligence
Harsh Parikh, Tyler McCormick, Emily Johnson, Leo Hickey, Megan Ranney, Bhramar Mukherjee

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for studying AI as a health determinant at the population level, distinguishing between ambient and personal AI exposure, and discusses implications for epidemiology and health equity.
Contribution
It proposes a novel conceptual framework borrowed from environmental epidemiology to measure and study AI's health effects at the population level.
Findings
AI functions as a determinant of health.
Existing experimental methods are inadequate for population-level effects.
Illustrates ideas with US survey data.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly shape how people access health information, make medical decisions, and receive care -- yet epidemiology lacks frameworks for measuring AI exposure or studying its health effects at the population level. Here we argue that AI now functions as a determinant of health and propose a conceptual framework, borrowed from environmental epidemiology, for studying it. We distinguish ambient AI exposure -- algorithmic curation and AI-mediated institutional decisions that affect populations regardless of individual choice -- from personal AI exposure -- direct, volitional use of AI tools. We characterize AI's possible causal roles in epidemiological models, show that existing experimental approaches are inadequate for capturing chronic, population-level effects, and illustrate these ideas with nationally representative US survey data. We discuss…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
