Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Derivative-Constrained PDEs
Kentaro Hoshisashi, Carolyn E Phelan, Paolo Barucca

TL;DR
This paper introduces Derivative-Constrained PINNs (DC-PINNs), an extension of Physics-Informed Neural Networks that efficiently incorporate derivative-based constraints, improving solution accuracy and physical fidelity for constrained PDE problems.
Contribution
DC-PINNs embed nonlinear derivative constraints into PINNs, enabling more accurate and physically consistent solutions for constrained PDEs with automatic differentiation and adaptive loss balancing.
Findings
DC-PINNs reduce constraint violations compared to baseline PINNs.
They improve physical fidelity in benchmark constrained PDE problems.
Explicit derivative constraints stabilize training and guide solutions.
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) recast PDE solving as an optimisation problem in function space by minimising a residual-based objective, yet many applications require additional derivative-based relations that are just as fundamental as the governing equations. In this paper, we present Derivative-Constrained PINNs (DC-PINNs), a general framework that treats constrained PDE solving as an optimisation guided by a minimum objective function criterion where the physics resides in the minimum principle. DC-PINNs embed general nonlinear constraints on states and derivatives, e.g., bounds, monotonicity, convexity, incompressibility, computed efficiently via automatic differentiation, and they employ self-adaptive loss balancing to tune the influence of each objective, reducing reliance on manual hyperparameters and problem-specific architectures. DC-PINNs consistently reduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
