Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health
Adam Poulsen, Ian B. Hickie, Carla Gorban, Zsofi de Haan, William Capon, Ebenezer Eyeson-Annan, Jalal Radwan, Elizabeth M. Scott, Frank Iorfino, Haley M. LaMonica

TL;DR
This study explores young people's perceptions of conversational AI chatbots in youth mental health, highlighting their attitudes, needs, and design recommendations for ethical and effective integration.
Contribution
It provides novel insights into youth perspectives and co-designed system requirements for genAI chatbots in mental health services.
Findings
Young people want human-like AI that maintains care quality.
Transparency about AI workings is important to users.
Recommendations for safe, ethical, and user-centered chatbot design.
Abstract
Conversational generative artificial intelligence agents (or genAI chatbots) could benefit youth mental health, yet young people's perspectives remain underexplored. We examined the Mental health Intelligence Agent (Mia), a genAI chatbot originally designed for professionals in Australian youth services. Following co-design, 32 young people participated in online workshops exploring their perceptions of genAI chatbots in youth mental health and to develop recommendations for reconceptualising Mia for consumers and integrating it into services. Four themes were developed: (1) Humanising AI without dehumanising care, (2) I need to know what's under the hood, (3) Right tool, right place, right time?, and (4) Making it mine on safe ground. This study offers insights into young people's attitudes, needs, and requirements regarding genAI chatbots in youth mental health, with key implications…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
