Revisiting the angular size-redshift cosmological test with milliarcsecond radio structures in active galactic nuclei
Mina Ghodsi Yengejeh, Tatiana A. Koryukova, Leonid I. Gurvits, S\'andor Frey, Alexander B. Pushkarev, Alexander V. Plavin, Kenneth I. Kellermann, Andr\'as Kov\'acs

TL;DR
This study revisits the angular size-redshift relation using VLBI radio observations of active galactic nuclei, demonstrating its potential for constraining cosmological parameters with larger datasets and refined analysis.
Contribution
It provides the first major update in 25 years using an order of magnitude larger dataset, assessing the method's ability to constrain matter density in a flat ΛCDM universe.
Findings
Randomization tests confirm the physical significance of the size-redshift relation.
Degeneracy exists between source size dependence and matter density parameter.
Method can constrain Ω_m with data scatter below ~20%, requiring larger samples or calibration.
Abstract
VLBI measurements of the sizes of compact extragalactic radio sources, jetted active galactic nuclei, provide data for probing the angular size--redshift relation, offering a complementary test to other distance--redshift methods. We analyse a significantly expanded dataset to reassess the angular size--redshift relation and its potential for constraining cosmological model parameters, focusing on the matter density parameter in a flat Cold Dark Matter Universe. This is the first major update of the compact-source angular size test in the past quarter of a century, using a dataset an order of magnitude larger than in previous studies. MCMC analysis on real data and on multiple mock catalogues to evaluate parameter constraints in the presence of observational scatter. In addition, we conducted a test with 100 randomized catalogues created by shuffling…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
