Fidelity of Machine Learned Potentials: Quantitative Assessment for Protonated Oxalate
Chen Qu, Paul L. Houston, Qi Yu, Apurba Nandi, Joel M. Bowman, and Valerii Andreichev, Silvan K\"aser, and Markus Meuwly

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy and consistency of two machine-learned potential energy surface methods for protonated oxalate, using stress tests and vibrational calculations, demonstrating their high agreement across diverse properties.
Contribution
It provides a detailed quantitative assessment of the fidelity of two ML-PES approaches, including stress testing and vibrational analysis, for complex molecular systems.
Findings
The two ML-PES methods show excellent agreement in energy and IR spectra.
Vibrational energies and tunneling splittings are accurately predicted by both methods.
The study demonstrates the reliability of ML-PESs in high-dimensional quantum calculations.
Abstract
There has been a veritable explosion of methods and software to perform machine-learned regression on datasets of electronic energies and forces to develop high-dimensional machine learned potential energy surfaces (ML-PESs). A major, but not deeply-studied aspect is how well different ML-PESs represent the same dataset on which they are trained, beyond the standard fitting precision metrics. Here, this is examined in detail using several ''stress tests'', for two widely applied machine-learned potential approaches. One is based on permutationally invariant polynomial (PIP) linear least square regression and the other is the message-passing neural network PhysNet approach. These potentials and dipole moment surfaces are used in VSCF/VCI calculations of vibrational energies and wavefunctions. The energies from the two PESs are directly compared as are the IR spectra. In addition,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
