On the Meaning of the Web as an Object of Study
Claudio Gutierrez, Daniel Hern\'andez

TL;DR
The paper discusses how the Web's evolution into a universal digital environment has fragmented its study and identity, calling for a community discussion to redefine its research scope.
Contribution
It analyzes the Web's transformation and its impact on the research community, highlighting the need for a new collective understanding of Web studies.
Findings
Web's identity crisis due to evolution into a universal environment
Fragmentation of the Web research community
Need for a community discussion to redefine Web study
Abstract
This text advances the hypothesis that the meaning of the Web as an object of study has diluted as a clear research domain. One example of this phenomenon is the identity crisis of the Web Conference and the International Semantic Web Conference. At its root is the Web's evolution from a focused technological object into a universal digital environment, a transition whose very success has fragmented its academic community and obscured its core identity. We chart this trajectory from a well-defined object of study to a fragmented backdrop, identifying key pressures such as the "academic tragedy of the commons" and the disruptive force of AI. We conclude that a fundamental community discussion is needed to define what it means to study the Web now that it has become the universal infrastructure for global digital activity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
