Perspective on a challenge: predicting the photochemistry of cyclobutanone

TL;DR

This paper reviews a community prediction challenge on cyclobutanone photochemistry, highlighting the predictive power of nonadiabatic dynamics and the importance of electronic-structure benchmarking.

Contribution

It summarizes diverse computational strategies used in a blind prediction challenge and compares them with experimental results, emphasizing strengths and weaknesses.

Findings

Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics show qualitative predictive power.

Electronic-structure theory significantly influences excited-state dynamics.

Benchmarking is crucial for reliable computational photochemistry.

Abstract

This Perspective is part of a Special Topic that explored the maturity of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics for predicting photochemical processes. In 2023, a prediction challenge was issued to the community of computational photochemists to simulate the photochemistry of cyclobutanone, photoexcited at 200 nm, and the resulting time-resolved MeV-UED signal. The challenge attracted 15 theoretical predictions from more than 70 researchers, employing a wide range of strategies for electronic structure and nonadiabatic molecular dynamics to predict the time-resolved MeV-UED signal before the experiment had been conducted at SLAC (Stanford, USA). The MeV-UED instrument at Shanghai Jiao Tong University was also used to provide a second independent time-resolved MeV-UED signal for the photochemistry of cyclobutanone. This Perspective discusses the various approaches and strategies used by the participants to predict the photochemistry of cyclobutanone. This work also summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of various methods used for photoexcitation, electronic structure, nonadiabatic dynamics, and calculation of observables, as agreed by the participants during a CECAM workshop dedicated to the results of the challenge and organized in Lausanne in April 2025. This Perspective also collects all the predicted time-resolved MeV-UED signals into a single figure, together with the experimental signal. This challenge (i) demonstrated the qualitative predictive power of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics and (ii) underscore the impact of electronic-structure theory on the outcome of the excited-state dynamics and the need for its careful benchmarking. This effort allowed the community to share practical strategies to perform nonadiabatic dynamics (discussed in the present Perspective) and constitutes a 'calibration' exercise for computational photochemistry.