Risk-Calibrated Learning: Minimizing Fatal Errors in Medical AI
Abolfazl Mohammadi-Seif, Ricardo Baeza-Yates

TL;DR
This paper introduces Risk-Calibrated Learning, a method that reduces critical, semantically incoherent errors in medical AI models by embedding a severity matrix, improving safety across multiple imaging modalities.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel risk-aware loss function that explicitly suppresses catastrophic errors without complex architecture changes, validated across diverse medical imaging datasets.
Findings
Reduces Critical Error Rate (CER) significantly across all datasets.
Achieves safety improvements up to 92.4% on prostate histopathology.
Enhances safety-accuracy trade-off in CNN and Transformer models.
Abstract
Deep learning models often achieve expert-level accuracy in medical image classification but suffer from a critical flaw: semantic incoherence. These high-confidence mistakes that are semantically incoherent (e.g., classifying a malignant tumor as benign) fundamentally differ from acceptable errors which stem from visual ambiguity. Unlike safe, fine-grained disagreements, these fatal failures erode clinical trust. To address this, we propose Risk-Calibrated Learning, a technique that explicitly distinguishes between visual ambiguity (fine-grained errors) and catastrophic structural errors. By embedding a confusion-aware clinical severity matrix M into the optimization landscape, our method suppresses critical errors (false negatives) without requiring complex architectural changes. We validate our approach in four different imaging modalities: Brain Tumor MRI, ISIC 2018 (Dermoscopy),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
