HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models
Zixing Chen, Yifeng Gao, Li Wang, Yunhan Zhao, Yi Liu, Jiayu Li, Xiang Zheng, Zuxuan Wu, Cong Wang, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang Jiang

TL;DR
HazardArena is a benchmark designed to evaluate and improve semantic safety in vision-language-action models, revealing vulnerabilities and proposing a training-free safety mechanism.
Contribution
The paper introduces HazardArena, a novel benchmark with risk-sensitive scenarios, and a Safety Option Layer to enhance semantic safety without retraining models.
Findings
VLA models trained on safe scenarios often fail in unsafe contexts.
HazardArena includes over 2,000 assets and 40 risk-sensitive tasks.
The Safety Option Layer reduces unsafe behaviors with minimal performance impact.
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models inherit rich world knowledge from vision-language backbones and acquire executable skills via action demonstrations. However, existing evaluations largely focus on action execution success, leaving action policies loosely coupled with visual-linguistic semantics. This decoupling exposes a systematic vulnerability whereby correct action execution may induce unsafe outcomes under semantic risk. To expose this vulnerability, we introduce HazardArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate semantic safety in VLAs under controlled yet risk-bearing contexts. HazardArena is constructed from safe/unsafe twin scenarios that share matched objects, layouts, and action requirements, differing only in the semantic context that determines whether an action is unsafe. We find that VLA models trained exclusively on safe scenarios often fail to behave safely when evaluated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
