Memory as Metabolism: A Design for Companion Knowledge Systems

TL;DR

This paper proposes a companion-specific governance framework for personal knowledge systems built on LLMs, emphasizing memory management operations to address epistemic failure modes and ensure user-aligned knowledge retention.

Contribution

It introduces a normative governance profile and five core operations for personal LLM memory systems to improve long-term knowledge consistency and user alignment.

Findings

Memory operations support knowledge decay and contextualization.

Contradictory evidence influences dominant interpretations through buffer pressure.

The framework addresses epistemic failure modes like entrenchment and ossification.

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation remains the dominant pattern for giving LLMs persistent memory, but a visible cluster of personal wiki-style memory architectures emerged in April 2026 -- design proposals from Karpathy, MemPalace, and LLM Wiki v2 that compile knowledge into an interlinked artifact for long-term use by a single user. They sit alongside production memory systems that the major labs have shipped for over a year, and an active academic lineage including MemGPT, Generative Agents, Mem0, Zep, A-Mem, MemMachine, SleepGate, and Second Me. Within a 2026 landscape of emerging governance frameworks for agent context and memory -- including Context Cartography and MemOS -- this paper proposes a companion-specific governance profile: a set of normative obligations, a time-structured procedural rule, and testable conformance invariants for the specific failure mode of entrenchment under user-coupled drift in single-user knowledge wikis built on the LLM wiki pattern. The design principle is that personal LLM memory is a companion system: its job is to mirror the user on operational dimensions (working vocabulary, load-bearing structure, continuity of context) and compensate on epistemic failure modes (entrenchment, suppression of contradicting evidence, Kuhnian ossification). Five operations implement this split -- TRIAGE, DECAY, CONTEXTUALIZE, CONSOLIDATE, AUDIT -- supported by memory gravity and minority-hypothesis retention. The sharpest prediction: accumulated contradictory evidence should have a structural path to updating a centrality-protected dominant interpretation through multi-cycle buffer pressure accumulation, a failure mode no existing benchmark captures. The safety story at the single-agent level is partial, and the paper is explicit about what it does and does not solve.