Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors
Francesco Iacovelli, Luca Reali, Emanuele Berti, Alessandra Corsi, B. S. Sathyaprakash, Digvijay Wadekar

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how the baseline length between next-generation gravitational-wave detectors affects the sky localization of binary black hole mergers, highlighting the benefits of adding a third detector for improved localization accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the impact of detector baseline length and network configuration on localization capabilities for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors.
Findings
Baselines of 8-11 ms travel time offer a good balance for localization.
Shorter baselines significantly reduce localization quality, especially for high SNR events.
Adding a third detector greatly improves localization, reducing multimodality.
Abstract
Next-generation (XG) gravitational-wave detectors, such as Cosmic Explorer (CE) and the Einstein Telescope (ET), will observe compact binary coalescences at unprecedented rates and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Accurate sky localization of these sources is crucial for several aspects of the science case of CE and ET. The localization of most binary black hole (BBH) signals, which will spend at most a few minutes within the XG detector's effective sensitivity band, will continue to rely primarily on timing triangulation across a network of detectors. A key design choice for triangulation is the baseline between instruments. We investigate how the baseline affects the localization capabilities of a two-detector CE network, analyzing both fixed-parameter injections and a realistic BBH population consistent with the latest GWTC-4 results. For detector-frame total masses up to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
