TL;DR
This paper introduces a generalized least squares method for more accurate estimation of log-law parameters in turbulent boundary layers, accounting for error correlations and uncertainties, with an open-source Python implementation.
Contribution
It develops a standardized GLS framework for log-law parameter estimation, improving accuracy and providing new insights into parameter correlation and fitting procedures.
Findings
GLS outperforms OLS and WLS in uncertainty quantification.
Synthetic data analysis predicts dominant uncertainty sources.
New fitting method removes need for log region prescription.
Abstract
Uncertainty in estimating the log-law parameters is arguably the greatest obstacle to establishing definitive conclusions regarding their numerical values and universality. This challenge is exacerbated by the limited number of studies that provide thorough uncertainty analyses of experimental data and fitting procedures, and those that do often adopt different approaches, undermining direct comparisons. The present study applies the generalised least squares (GLS) principle to the log-law velocity profile to establish a standardised, comprehensive framework for quantifying uncertainty in the log-law parameters across datasets. GLS contrasts with ordinary least squares (OLS) and weighted least squares (WLS), which do not account for correlation in errors across measured quantities, as well as with alternative heuristic methods that independently sample primitive variables. Instead, it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
