The Non-Optimality of Scientific Knowledge: Path Dependence, Lock-In, and The Local Minimum Trap
Mohamed Mabrok

TL;DR
This paper models scientific progress as an optimization process prone to local optima due to path dependence and institutional lock-in, highlighting the need for strategies to escape these traps.
Contribution
It introduces an analogy between scientific development and gradient descent, identifying mechanisms of lock-in and proposing interventions to overcome local optima in science.
Findings
Science often follows local optima due to historical and institutional factors.
Identifies cognitive, formal, and institutional lock-in mechanisms.
Proposes meta-scientific strategies to escape local optima.
Abstract
Science is widely regarded as humanity's most reliable method for uncovering truths about the natural world. Yet the \emph{trajectory} of scientific discovery is rarely examined as an optimization problem in its own right. This paper argues that the body of scientific knowledge, at any given historical moment, represents a \emph{local optimum} rather than a global one--that the frameworks, formalisms, and paradigms through which we understand nature are substantially shaped by historical contingency, cognitive path dependence, and institutional lock-in. Drawing an analogy to gradient descent in machine learning, we propose that science follows the steepest local gradient of tractability, empirical accessibility, and institutional reward, and in doing so may bypass fundamentally superior descriptions of nature. We develop this thesis through detailed case studies spanning mathematics,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
