Combining the Mass--Radius Posteriors of J0030+0451 Allowing for Unknown Model Systematics
Ryan O'Connor, Chun Huang, Alexander Y. Chen

TL;DR
This paper combines multiple neutron star mass-radius posteriors for PSR J0030+0451, accounting for unknown systematic uncertainties, to produce a unified, conservative constraint useful for dense matter equation-of-state studies.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework to merge diverse $M$--$R$ posteriors while explicitly modeling unknown systematics, improving the robustness of neutron star EoS inferences.
Findings
Combined eight $M$--$R$ posteriors into a single conservative posterior.
Derived neutron star mass $1.46^{+0.09}_{-0.08}\,M_ ext{sun}$ and radius $12.69^{+0.64}_{-0.55}\, ext{km}.
Produced joint constraints on neutron star radius and tidal deformability.
Abstract
The NASA Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (\emph{NICER}) mission measures the X-ray pulse profiles of select millisecond pulsars and uses sophisticated pulse profile modeling (PPM) techniques to constrain their masses () and radii (), in order to probe the state of matter in their interiors. One of the most studied pulsars, PSR J0030+0451, has been analyzed by multiple groups using different choices of hotspot models. The different choices of hotspot prescriptions to fit the same observational data led to different -- posteriors that do not completely agree with one another, resulting in a practical bottleneck for dense-matter equation-of-state (EoS) inference. In this paper, we adapt a robust Bayesian combination framework to the published -- posteriors of PSR J0030+0451 while allowing for unknown systematic uncertainties that might have led to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
