Loop-dependent entangling holonomies in localized topological quartets

TL;DR

This paper investigates how loop holonomies in localized topological quartets can transition from local to entangling, revealing limitations of standard Berry data and emphasizing the importance of subgroup distance as a diagnostic.

Contribution

It demonstrates that loop-dependent entangling holonomies occur in topological quartets and introduces a diagnostic based on subgroup distance, extending the analysis to multiplets with product structure.

Findings

Counter-rotating loops in BHZ yield entanglers, unlike co-rotating ones.

SSH provides a stable controlled-rotation example.

Standard Berry data cannot distinguish local from entangling holonomies.

Abstract

A spectrally isolated quartet can admit a local two-qubit description at each point in parameter space and still acquire a loop holonomy outside the local subgroup $\mathrm{U}(2)\otimes\mathrm{U}(2)$. We study this question in three localized topological settings, a BHZ ribbon, a spinful SSH chain, and a BBH corner quartet. On a fixed quartet, changing only the loop can move the holonomy from almost local to entangling. In BHZ, co-rotating and counter-rotating edge-field loops have nearly the same eigenphase data, but only the counter-rotating loop yields an Ising-like entangler. SSH gives a controlled-rotation example in a numerically stable edge quartet. BBH shows the same issue in a higher-order corner quartet. Standard Berry data, including Berry phases, Chern numbers, determinant phases, and eigenphase spectra, do not separate these cases. The main diagnostic is the distance from the loop holonomy to the extracted local subgroup. Canonical two-qubit coordinates are used only after reduction failure has been identified. The quartet is the smallest setting in which this question can be tested explicitly. The same subgroup-reduction problem extends to any isolated multiplet with pointwise product type $D=\prod_{\alpha}d_\alpha$, where the relevant local subgroup is the embedded product group $G_{\mathbf d}=\mathrm{Im}[\prod_{\alpha}U(d_\alpha)\to U(D)]$. In the terminology of Ref.[arXiv:2601.13764], these examples realize loop-dependent entangling gluing.