The Impact of Federated Learning on Distributed Remote Sensing Archives
Anand Umashankar, Karam Tomotaki-Dawoud, Nicolai Schneider

TL;DR
This paper empirically evaluates federated learning strategies for remote sensing image classification, addressing data heterogeneity challenges and analyzing the impact of model architecture and communication costs.
Contribution
It systematically compares FL algorithms like FedAvg, FedProx, and BSP on remote sensing data with non-IID distributions, providing insights into their performance and trade-offs.
Findings
FedProx outperforms FedAvg with deeper CNNs under data heterogeneity.
BSP achieves near-centralized accuracy but with higher communication costs.
LeNet offers the best accuracy-communication balance for the dataset.
Abstract
Remote sensing archives are inherently distributed: Earth observation missions such as Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-3 have collectively accumulated more than 5 petabytes of imagery, stored and processed across many geographically dispersed platforms. Training machine learning models on such data in a centralized fashion is impractical due to data volume, sovereignty constraints, and geographic distribution. Federated learning (FL) addresses this by keeping data local and exchanging only model updates. A central challenge for remote sensing is the non-IID nature of Earth observation data: label distributions vary strongly by geographic region, degrading the convergence of standard FL algorithms. In this paper, we conduct a systematic empirical study of three FL strategies -- FedAvg, FedProx, and bulk synchronous parallel (BSP) -- applied to multi-label remote sensing image…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
