Will a Large Complex System be Stable? Revisited
Michael Thorne

TL;DR
This paper revisits the complexity-stability debate in ecological systems, offering a new mathematical approach to better understand stability mechanisms beyond random matrix theory.
Contribution
It introduces a novel mathematical framework that clarifies stability mechanisms in large ecological systems, challenging previous broad conclusions.
Findings
Revisits May's stability analysis with new mathematical tools
Provides detailed insights into stability mechanisms in complex systems
Counteracts the broad conclusion that larger systems are inherently less stable
Abstract
Over fifty years ago, Robert May applied random matrix theory to show that as ecological systems grow in size, stability decreases. What emerged from this and the critique that followed was decades of what has been called the complexity-stability debate. However, decades of critique over the assumptions that Robert May applied in carrying out his analysis have not been enough to fully dispel the strength of his conclusion and close the debate. Drawing on a mathematical approach that had not yet been fully developed in the early 70s, it is possible to revisit the argument without the use of random matrix techniques, and provide more detailed understanding of the mechanisms that play a deciding role in stability of ecological systems, countering the broad conclusion that led to the complexity-stability debate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
