Self-consistent computation of pair production from non-relativistic effective field theories in the Keldysh-Schwinger formalism
Tobias Binder, Edward Wang

TL;DR
This paper develops a self-consistent method using non-relativistic effective field theory and the Keldysh-Schwinger formalism to include pair creation effects in the computation of annihilation processes, confirming previous vacuum results and analyzing bound-state contributions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to incorporate pair-creation effects into the computation of four-point functions, extending previous vacuum analyses to finite temperature and out-of-equilibrium scenarios.
Findings
Bound states remain on-shell during decay despite Breit-Wigner spectral functions.
The method confirms vacuum results for scattering states in the dilute regime.
Bound-state contributions beyond leading decay are analyzed for the first time.
Abstract
Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation cross sections in the presence of nearly zero-energy bound states can become so large that perturbative partial-wave unitarity appears to be violated. Previous literature incorporated the short-distance annihilation potential self-consistently into the computation of the Schr\"odinger wave function at the origin, leading to the unitarization of the Sommerfeld effect in vacuum. We employ non-relativistic effective field theory methods and the Keldysh-Schwinger formalism to additionally include pair-creation effects in the self-consistent computation of four-point correlation functions, which renders the unitarization temperature dependent. Up to small thermal corrections in the non-relativistic and dilute regime of the pairs, we confirm the previous results based on the Schr\"odinger equation approach for scattering states in vacuum. For the first time,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
