Understanding the Gap Between Stated and Revealed Preferences in News Curation: A Study of Young Adult Social Media Users
Do Won Kim, Cody Buntain, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia

TL;DR
This study explores the disconnect between young adults' expressed preferences and their actual social media behaviors, revealing how they navigate value trade-offs in feed curation.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into the preferences-behavior gap and offers design directions to align algorithmic curation with user values.
Findings
Participants engage with content they do not endorse despite valuing quality.
Users prioritize accuracy and diversity when curating ideal feeds.
Feed curation involves social and contextual considerations.
Abstract
Social media feed algorithms infer user preferences from their past behaviors. Yet what drives engagement often diverges from what users value. We examine this gap between stated preferences (what users say they prefer) and revealed preferences (what their behavior suggests they prefer) among young adults, a group deeply embedded in algorithmically mediated environments. Using a mixed-methods approach combining surveys and interviews with feed curation activities, we investigate: what gaps exist between stated and revealed preferences; how users make sense of these gaps; what values users believe should guide algorithmic curation; and how systems might reflect those values. Participants often found themselves engaging with low-quality content they did not endorse, despite wanting high-quality information. When asked to curate an ideal social media news feed for a hypothetical persona,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
