The Missing Knowledge Layer in Cognitive Architectures for AI Agents
Micha\"el Roynard (LAAS-OASIS)

TL;DR
This paper identifies a missing explicit Knowledge layer in cognitive architectures for AI, proposing a four-layer model with distinct persistence semantics and demonstrating its feasibility through implementations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel four-layer decomposition (Knowledge, Memory, Wisdom, Intelligence) with different persistence semantics, addressing a key gap in existing architectures.
Findings
Surveyed existing memory systems and identified eight convergence points.
Proposed a four-layer architecture with distinct persistence semantics.
Provided Python and Rust implementations demonstrating architectural feasibility.
Abstract
The two most influential cognitive architecture frameworks for AI agents, CoALA [21] and JEPA [12], both lack an explicit Knowledge layer with its own persistence semantics. This gap produces a category error: systems apply cognitive decay to factual claims, or treat facts and experiences with identical update mechanics. We survey persistence semantics across existing memory systems and identify eight convergence points, from Karpathy's LLM Knowledge Base [10] to the BEAM benchmark's near-zero contradiction-resolution scores [22], all pointing to related architectural gaps. We propose a four-layer decom position (Knowledge, Memory, Wisdom, Intelligence) where each layer has fundamentally different persistence semantics: indefinite supersession, Ebbinghaus decay, evidence-gated revision, and ephemeral inference respectively. Companion implementations in Python and Rust demonstrate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
