Uncertainty-Aware Web-Conditioned Scientific Fact-Checking
Ashwin Vinod, Katrin Erk

TL;DR
This paper introduces an uncertainty-aware fact-checking pipeline that combines atomic predicate-argument decomposition with web corroboration to improve accuracy and interpretability in specialized scientific domains.
Contribution
It presents a novel framework that selectively uses web evidence based on calibrated uncertainty, enhancing verification accuracy and transparency in high-stakes settings.
Findings
Outperforms existing benchmarks on multiple datasets.
Web corroboration is invoked selectively, not routinely.
Calibrated uncertainty gating improves interpretability and efficiency.
Abstract
Scientific fact-checking is vital for assessing claims in specialized domains such as biomedicine and materials science, yet existing systems often hallucinate or apply inconsistent reasoning, especially when verifying technical, compositional claims against an evidence snippet under source and cost/latency constraints. We present a pipeline centered on atomic predicate-argument decomposition and calibrated, uncertainty-gated corroboration: atomic facts are aligned to local snippets via embeddings, verified by a compact evidence-grounded checker, and only facts with uncertain support trigger domain-restricted web search over authoritative sources. The system supports both binary and tri-valued classification where it predicts labels from Supported, Refuted, NEI for three-way tasks. We evaluate under two regimes, Context-Only (no web) and Context+Web (uncertainty-gated web…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
