Quantum Measurement Statistics as Bayesian Uncertainty Estimators for Physics-Constrained Learning
Prasad Nimantha Madusanka Ukwatta Hewage, Midhun Chakkravarthy, Ruvan Kumara Abeysekara

TL;DR
This paper links quantum measurement statistics from variational quantum circuits to Bayesian uncertainty, demonstrating a natural, efficient way to quantify uncertainty in physics-informed machine learning without complex Bayesian neural networks.
Contribution
It establishes a formal connection between quantum measurement statistics and Bayesian uncertainty, enabling calibrated UQ in physics-constrained models with fewer computational resources.
Findings
Quantum UQ achieves near-target coverage probabilities with N >= 5000 shots.
Physics-constrained circuits significantly reduce calibration error compared to unconstrained ones.
Quantum circuits extract more UQ information per evaluation than classical methods.
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for deploying machine learning models in safety-critical physical systems, yet classical Bayesian approaches incur substantial computational overhead. We establish a formal connection between Born-rule measurement statistics from variational quantum circuits (VQCs) and Bayesian posterior uncertainty, proving that repeated quantum measurements naturally produce calibrated prediction intervals without requiring explicit Bayesian neural network (BNN) machinery. We demonstrate this framework on physics-constrained VQCs trained on PDE residuals. Systematic experiments comparing quantum shot-based UQ against MC Dropout and Deep Ensemble baselines show that quantum UQ achieves coverage probabilities within 1-3% of target confidence levels at N >= 5000 shots, while MC Dropout systematically over-covers by 4-5%. Physics-constrained circuits reduce the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
