Variable-Length Markov Chains on Finite Quivers: Boundary-Window Identifiability, Exact Depth, and Local Rank Comparison
Oleg Kiriukhin

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding variable-length Markov chains on finite quivers, focusing on boundary-window observability, depth identification, and rank comparison, with implications for stochastic growth models.
Contribution
It introduces a first-order theory of visible-depth identifiability and characterizes boundary process properties, including rank loss and depth determination, in quiver-valued Markov chains.
Findings
All admissible visible depths encode the same extension law in the edge-homogeneous regime.
The boundary process at exact depth r is a finite-state Markov chain with deterministic truncations.
Rank cannot increase beyond the context length r, with explicit criteria for depth and rank loss.
Abstract
Variable-length Markov chains on finite quivers provide a natural framework for context-dependent stochastic growth under incidence constraints. I study quiver-valued variable-length Markov chains observed through finite boundary windows and develop a first-order theory of visible-depth identifiability via stationary visible one-step transition laws and their restricted differentials on prescribed tangent blocks. For visible depth , the main object is the stationary one-step informative map . In the edge-homogeneous regime, once the local visible support is fixed and the representation hypothesis holds, all admissible visible depths encode the same edge-level extension law and hence have the same first-order rank. In the exact-depth regime of context length , the depth- boundary process is the canonical finite-state Markov chain, smaller visible windows…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
