AIM-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Affective Image Manipulation via Fine-Grained Hierarchical Control
Shi Chen, Xuecheng Wu, Heli Sun, Yunyun Shi, Xinyi Yin, Fengjian Xue, Jinheng Xie, Dingkang Yang, Hao Wang, Junxiao Xue, Liang He

TL;DR
This paper introduces AIM-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for affective image manipulation that includes a new dataset, evaluation metrics, and insights into current model limitations and improvements.
Contribution
It presents the first dedicated benchmark for AIM, a balanced dataset AIM-40k, and a hierarchical evaluation framework to advance affective image editing research.
Findings
Current models struggle with positivity bias in AIM tasks.
The AIM-40k dataset improves model performance by 9.15%.
Hierarchical human-in-the-loop workflow enhances sample quality.
Abstract
Affective Image Manipulation (AIM) aims to evoke specific emotions through targeted editing. Current image editing benchmarks primarily focus on object-level modifications in general scenarios, lacking the fine-grained granularity to capture affective dimensions. To bridge this gap, we introduce the first benchmark designed for AIM termed AIM-Bench. This benchmark is built upon a dual-path affective modeling scheme that integrates the Mikels emotion taxonomy with the Valence-Arousal-Dominance framework, enabling high-level semantic and fine-grained continuous manipulation. Through a hierarchical human-in-the-loop workflow, we finally curate 800 high-quality samples covering 8 emotional categories and 5 editing types. To effectively assess performance, we also design a composite evaluation suite combining rule-based and model-based metrics to holistically assess instruction consistency,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
