A Path to Constraints on Common Envelope Ejection in Massive Binaries: Full Evolutionary Reconstruction of Three Black Hole X-ray Binaries
Zhenwei Li, Dandan Wei, Shi Jia, Hailiang Chen, Hongwei Ge, Zhuo Chen, Yangyang Zhang, Xuefei Chen, Zhanwen Han

TL;DR
This study reconstructs the evolution of three black hole X-ray binaries to constrain the common envelope ejection efficiency, revealing that high efficiency parameters are necessary and suggesting the need for additional energy sources or formalism revision.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic constraints on common envelope efficiency parameters for massive binaries using detailed evolutionary reconstructions.
Findings
Minimum CE efficiency parameters are greater than 4.2 to 6.7 depending on energy considerations.
No solutions found with CE efficiency below unity, even with reduced envelope binding energy.
Substantial natal kicks are required for the formation of one of the studied binaries.
Abstract
The massive binary common envelope (CE) phase plays a pivotal role in the formation of close black hole/neutron star (BH/NS) binaries, yet significant uncertainties remain in our understanding of this process. In this study, we aim to constrain the massive binary CE phase by systematically reconstructing three observed BH X-ray binaries (BHXBs): GRO J1655-40, SAX J1819.3-2525, and 4U 1543-47. Through comprehensive binary evolution simulations and parametric supernova (SN) modeling, we establish lower limits for the CE efficiency parameters under different energy considerations within the standard energy formalism. Specifically, we derive minimum values for three cases: and representing CE efficiencies with half and all of the internal energy contributing to the envelope ejection, respectively, and accounting for the envelope's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
