TL;DR
This paper introduces scalable methods for creating comprehensive time series reasoning benchmarks using synthetic and real-world data, revealing current LLM limitations in understanding and domain-specific applications.
Contribution
It presents TimeSeriesExam and TimeSeriesExamAgent, novel approaches for generating diverse, large-scale time series reasoning benchmarks automatically from real datasets.
Findings
Benchmarks achieve diversity comparable to manual curation
LLMs show limited performance in abstract and domain-specific time series reasoning
Automatic benchmark generation is effective across multiple real-world domains
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in time series modeling tasks, but do they truly understand time series data? While multiple benchmarks have been proposed to answer this fundamental question, most are manually curated and focus on narrow domains or specific skill sets. To address this limitation, we propose scalable methods for creating comprehensive time series reasoning benchmarks that combine the flexibility of templates with the creativity of LLM agents. We first develop TimeSeriesExam, a multiple-choice benchmark using synthetic time series to evaluate LLMs across five core reasoning categories: pattern recognitionnoise understandingsimilarity analysisanomaly detection, and causality. Then, with TimeSeriesExamAgent, we scale our approach by automatically generating benchmarks from real-world datasets spanning healthcare, finance and weather domains.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
