Exploring the impact of fairness-aware criteria in AutoML
Joana Sim\~oes, Jo\~ao Correia

TL;DR
This paper investigates how incorporating fairness criteria into AutoML pipelines affects model performance and fairness, showing trade-offs and benefits in fairness and data efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a method to embed multiple fairness metrics into AutoML optimization, impacting model fairness, complexity, and data usage.
Findings
Fairness improved by 14.5% on average
Predictive power decreased by 9.4%
Data usage reduced by 35.7%
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) systems are increasingly used to support decision-making processes that affect individuals. However, these systems often rely on biased data, which can lead to unfair outcomes against specific groups. With the growing adoption of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), the risk of intensifying discriminatory behaviours increases, as most frameworks primarily focus on model selection to maximise predictive performance. Previous research on fairness in AutoML had largely followed this trend, integrating fairness awareness only in the model selection or hyperparameter tuning, while neglecting other critical stages of the ML pipeline. This paper aims to study the impact of integrating fairness directly into the optimisation component of an AutoML framework that constructs complete ML pipelines, from data selection and transformations to model selection and tuning. As…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
