Reason Only When Needed: Efficient Generative Reward Modeling via Model-Internal Uncertainty
Chao Xue, Yao Wang, Mengqiao Liu, Di Liang, Xingsheng Han, Peiyang Liu, Xianjie Wu, Chenyao Lu, Lei Jiang, Yu Lu, Haibo Shi, Shuang Liang, Minlong Peng, Flora D. Salim

TL;DR
This paper introduces E-GRM, an efficient generative reward modeling framework that uses model-internal uncertainty to selectively apply Chain-of-Thought reasoning, reducing costs and improving accuracy in reasoning tasks.
Contribution
E-GRM leverages model-internal uncertainty to trigger reasoning only when necessary and employs a hybrid scorer for better reward fidelity, advancing efficient reasoning in LLMs.
Findings
E-GRM reduces inference costs significantly.
E-GRM improves answer accuracy across reasoning benchmarks.
Model-internal uncertainty effectively guides reasoning decisions.
Abstract
Recent advancements in the Generative Reward Model (GRM) have demonstrated its potential to enhance the reasoning abilities of LLMs through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Despite these gains, existing implementations of GRM suffer from two critical limitations. First, CoT prompting is applied indiscriminately to all inputs regardless of their inherent complexity. This introduces unnecessary computational costs for tasks amenable to fast, direct inference. Second, existing approaches primarily rely on voting-based mechanisms to evaluate CoT outputs, which often lack granularity and precision in assessing reasoning quality. In this paper, we propose E-GRM, an efficient generative reward modeling framework grounded in model-internal uncertainty. E-GRM leverages the convergence behavior of parallel model generations to estimate uncertainty and selectively trigger CoT reasoning only when…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
