A Comparative Study of Modern Object Detectors for Robust Apple Detection in Orchard Imagery
Mohammed Asad, Ajai Kumar Gautam, Priyanshu Dhiman, and Rishi Raj Prajapati

TL;DR
This study compares six modern object detectors for apple detection in orchard images, establishing a controlled benchmark to evaluate their accuracy, robustness, and suitability for agricultural applications.
Contribution
It provides a fair, reproducible comparison of detectors on a public dataset using a unified evaluation protocol, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
YOLO11n achieves the highest strict localization accuracy.
RT-DETR-L has very high recall but low precision at low confidence thresholds.
Detector choice should consider threshold robustness and downstream task needs.
Abstract
Accurate apple detection in orchard images is important for yield prediction, fruit counting, robotic harvesting, and crop monitoring. However, changing illumination, leaf clutter, dense fruit clusters, and partial occlusion make detection difficult. To provide a fair and reproducible comparison, this study establishes a controlled benchmark for single-class apple detection on the public AppleBBCH81 dataset using one deterministic train, validation, and test split and a unified evaluation protocol across six representative detectors: YOLOv10n, YOLO11n, RT-DETR-L, Faster R-CNN (ResNet50-FPN), FCOS (ResNet50-FPN), and SSDLite320 (MobileNetV3-Large). Performance is evaluated primarily using COCO-style [email protected] and [email protected]:0.95, and threshold-dependent behavior is further analyzed using precision-recall curves and fixed-threshold precision, recall, and F1-score at IoU = 0.5. On the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
