Typical hyperbolic surfaces have a spectral gap greater than $2/9 - \epsilon$
Nalini Anantharaman, Laura Monk

TL;DR
This paper proves that most hyperbolic surfaces have a spectral gap exceeding 2/9 minus epsilon, advancing towards the optimal gap of 1/4 minus epsilon.
Contribution
It establishes a lower bound on the spectral gap for typical hyperbolic surfaces sampled via Weil-Petersson measure, using explicit combinatorial exclusion techniques.
Findings
Spectral gap exceeds 2/9 - epsilon for typical surfaces.
Uses inclusion-exclusion to exclude tangles at precision 1/g.
Progress towards proving the optimal spectral gap 1/4 - epsilon.
Abstract
In this article, we prove that typical hyperbolic surfaces, sampled with the Weil-Petersson probability measure, have a spectral gap at least . This is an intermediate result on the way to our proof of the optimal spectral gap , building on the results of the first part of this series. A significant part of the proof is an explicit inclusion-exclusion argument to exclude tangles at the level of precision .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
