Gaia astrometry disfavors a binary origin for long secondary periods
Cheyanne Shariat, Kareem El-Badry, Morgan MacLeod, and Emily Leiner

TL;DR
This study uses Gaia data to test if binary companions cause long secondary periods in red giants, finding evidence against the binary hypothesis and suggesting alternative stellar mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence that disfavors the binary companion explanation for long secondary periods in luminous red giants.
Findings
RV variability implies companions around 0.1 solar masses, in the brown dwarf desert.
Predicted Gaia astrometric signatures are not observed in the data.
Most LSP stars are likely single, challenging the binary hypothesis.
Abstract
Approximately one-third of luminous pulsating red giant stars exhibit long secondary periods (LSPs): stable photometric variability with periods of several months to years in addition to their much shorter primary pulsation cycles. Now nearly a century after their discovery, the physical origin of LSPs remains unresolved. A leading explanation invokes binarity, in which the LSP corresponds to the orbital period of a low-mass companion responsible for both the photometric variability and the radial-velocity (RV) modulation. We test this hypothesis using a nearby sample of LSP stars from the {\it Gaia} Focused Product Release, which provides multi-epoch RVs and contemporaneous optical photometry. We find that interpreting the observed RV variability as orbital motion implies companion masses narrowly distributed around with separations of 1--3 au, placing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
