A first empirical derivation of the average dust attenuation law at 2<z<7
Giulia Rodighiero, Gaia Edes Esposito, Daniela Calzetti, Pietro Benotto, Michele Catone, Paolo Cassata, Giovanni Gandolfi, Laura Bisigello, Stefano Carniani, Alvio Renzini, Irene Shivaei, Benedetta Vulcani, Annagrazia Puglisi

TL;DR
This study empirically derives the average dust attenuation law for star-forming galaxies between redshifts 2 and 7 using JWST spectroscopy, revealing a curve similar to local starbursts but flatter in the UV.
Contribution
First empirical determination of the average dust attenuation law at 2<z<7 based on JWST data, extending previous studies to earlier cosmic epochs.
Findings
Attenuation curve consistent with local starburst relation in slope and normalization.
The derived curve is systematically flatter in the ultraviolet compared to intermediate redshift results.
No significant UV bump detected in the average attenuation curve.
Abstract
Dust attenuation strongly affects the observed spectral energy distributions of galaxies, introducing significant uncertainties in the derivation of key physical properties such as star formation rates, stellar masses, and metallicities. While attenuation curves have been extensively studied in the local Universe and at intermediate redshift, direct spectroscopic constraints at earlier cosmic epochs have remained limited prior to JWST. We aim to derive the average dust attenuation law of star-forming galaxies over the redshift range 2<z<7. We combine NIRSpec spectroscopy from the JADES survey with deep multi-wavelength photometry from the ASTRODEEP catalogs. Using a mass-selected sample (log(M_\star/M_\odot) > 9) of 120 galaxies with reliable Balmer decrement (Ha/Hb), we construct stacked spectral energy distributions in bins of Balmer optical depth and derive the selective attenuation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
