Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate
Yiqing Liu, Hantao Yao, Wu Liu, Allen He, Yongdong Zhang

TL;DR
HCP-MAD introduces a three-stage adaptive multi-agent debate framework that improves accuracy and reduces token costs by dynamically adjusting collaboration complexity based on task difficulty.
Contribution
The paper proposes HCP-MAD, a novel multi-agent debate method that uses consensus signals for progressive reasoning and adaptive collaboration to handle tasks efficiently.
Findings
HCP-MAD achieves higher accuracy on multiple benchmarks.
It significantly reduces token costs compared to existing methods.
The three-stage mechanism effectively adapts to task complexity.
Abstract
Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a collaborative framework in which multiple agents iteratively refine solutions through the generation of reasoning and alternating critique cycles. Current work primarily optimizes intra-round topologies and inter-round interactions separately, which still results in high token costs regardless of task complexity. This work introduces Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate (HCP-MAD), leveraging consensus as a dynamic signal to facilitate progressive reasoning. The core motivation is that a majority of straightforward tasks can be effectively resolved via lightweight pair-agent debates, while complex tasks require expanded collaboration. Consequently, HCP-MAD employs a three-stage progressive reasoning mechanism to develop adaptive solutions across varying task complexities. Firstly, Heterogeneous Consensus Verification…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
