Agentic AI in Engineering and Manufacturing: Industry Perspectives on Utility, Adoption, Challenges, and Opportunities
Kristen M. Edwards, Maxwell Bauer, Claire Jacquillat, A. John Hart, Faez Ahmed

TL;DR
This study explores the adoption, value, and challenges of agentic AI in engineering and manufacturing, highlighting technical, organizational, and infrastructural barriers to broader deployment.
Contribution
It provides qualitative insights from interviews, identifying key barriers and a staged progression of AI utility in engineering workflows.
Findings
Near-term AI benefits focus on repetitive and data synthesis tasks.
Barriers include fragmented data, security requirements, and limited API access to legacy tools.
Trust, verification, and integration are crucial for higher-order AI automation.
Abstract
This work examines how AI, especially agentic systems, is being adopted in engineering and manufacturing workflows, what value it provides today, and what is needed for broader deployment. This is an exploratory and qualitative state-of-practice study grounded in over 30 interviews across four stakeholder groups (large enterprises, small/medium firms, AI developers, and CAD/CAM/CAE vendors). We find that near-term AI gains cluster around structured, repetitive work and data-intensive synthesis, while higher-value agentic gains come from orchestrating multi-step workflows across tools. Adoption is constrained less by model capability than by fragmented and machine-unfriendly data, stringent security and regulatory requirements, and limited API-accessible legacy toolchains. Reliability, verification, and auditability are central requirements for adoption, driving human-in-the-loop…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
