Adoption and Effectiveness of AI-Based Anomaly Detection for Cross Provider Health Data Exchange
Cao Tram Anh Hoang

TL;DR
This paper evaluates AI-based anomaly detection methods in cross-provider health data exchange, proposing a readiness framework and a staged deployment strategy balancing rule-based and machine learning approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a practical readiness framework and empirical insights for implementing AI anomaly detection in multi-provider healthcare settings.
Findings
Rule-based methods achieve high recall but higher alert volumes.
Isolation Forest reduces alert burden but has lower sensitivity.
SHAP analysis identifies provider mismatch and off-hours access as key anomaly drivers.
Abstract
This study investigates the adoption and effectiveness of AI-based anomaly detection in cross-provider electronic health record (EHR) environments. It aims to (1) identify the organisational and digital capabilities required for successful implementation and (2) evaluate the performance and interpretability of lightweight anomaly detection approaches using contextual audit data. A semi-systematic scoping synthesis is conducted to derive a four-pillar readiness framework covering governance, infrastructure/interoperability, workforce, and AI integration, operationalised as a 10-item checklist with measurable indicators. This is complemented by a simulation of cross-provider audit logs incorporating contextual features such as provider mismatch, time of access, days since discharge, session duration, and access frequency. A rule-based approach is benchmarked against Isolation Forest, with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
