Linear Programming for Multi-Criteria Assessment with Cardinal and Ordinal Data: A Pessimistic Virtual Gap Analysis
Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, Su-Chuan Shih

TL;DR
This paper introduces a linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis method for multi-criteria decision making, effectively handling subjective biases and diverse data types to improve alternative assessment.
Contribution
It presents a novel two-step VGA approach integrating cardinal and ordinal data for more reliable and scalable multi-criteria assessments.
Findings
The method assesses alternatives from a pessimistic perspective.
It effectively combines quantitative and qualitative criteria.
The approach is dependable and scalable for decision support systems.
Abstract
Multi-criteria Analysis (MCA) is used to rank alternatives based on various criteria. Key MCA methods, such as Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, estimate parameters for criteria to compute the performance of each alternative. Nonetheless, subjective evaluations and biases frequently influence the reliability of results, while the diversity of data affects the precision of the parameters. The novel linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models tackle these issues. This paper outlines a two-step method that integrates two novel VGA models to assess each alternative from a pessimistic perspective, using both quantitative and qualitative criteria, and employing cardinal and ordinal data. Next, prioritize the alternatives to eliminate the least favorable one. The proposed method is dependable and scalable, enabling thorough assessments efficiently and effectively…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
