Process Reward Agents for Steering Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning
Jiwoong Sohn, Tomasz Sternal, Kenneth Styppa, Torsten Hoefler, and Michael Moor

TL;DR
This paper introduces Process Reward Agents (PRA), a method for online, step-wise rewards in reasoning tasks, improving accuracy and generalization without retraining the underlying policy models.
Contribution
PRA enables dynamic, online reward signals during inference, outperforming prior post hoc methods and generalizing across various frozen policy models in knowledge-intensive reasoning.
Findings
Achieves 80.8% accuracy on MedQA with Qwen3-4B, setting a new state of the art.
Improves accuracy of frozen models by up to 25.7% without retraining.
Generalizes to unseen models ranging from 0.5B to 8B parameters.
Abstract
Reasoning in knowledge-intensive domains remains challenging as intermediate steps are often not locally verifiable: unlike math or code, evaluating step correctness may require synthesizing clues across large external knowledge sources. As a result, subtle errors can propagate through reasoning traces, potentially never to be detected. Prior work has proposed process reward models (PRMs), including retrieval-augmented variants, but these methods operate post hoc, scoring completed trajectories, which prevents their integration into dynamic inference procedures. Here, we introduce Process Reward Agents (PRA), a test-time method for providing domain-grounded, online, step-wise rewards to a frozen policy. In contrast to prior retrieval-augmented PRMs, PRA enables search-based decoding to rank and prune candidate trajectories at every generation step. Experiments on multiple medical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
