Do We Really Need to Approach the Entire Pareto Front in Many-Objective Bayesian Optimisation?
Chao Jiang, Jingyu Huang, Miqing Li

TL;DR
This paper challenges the necessity of approximating the entire Pareto front in many-objective Bayesian optimisation, proposing a single-point focus approach that enhances solution quality within limited evaluations.
Contribution
It introduces the SPMO framework and ESPI acquisition function, emphasizing single-solution optimisation over Pareto front approximation in high-objective scenarios.
Findings
SPMO outperforms existing methods on benchmark problems.
ESPI can be effectively optimized with gradient-based methods.
Theoretical convergence guarantees are established for ESPI.
Abstract
Many-objective optimisation, a subset of multi-objective optimisation, involves optimisation problems with more than three objectives. As the number of objectives increases, the number of solutions needed to adequately represent the entire Pareto front typically grows substantially. This makes it challenging, if not infeasible, to design a search algorithm capable of effectively exploring the entire Pareto front. This difficulty is particularly acute in the Bayesian optimisation paradigm, where sample efficiency is critical and only a limited number of solutions (often a few hundred) are evaluated. Moreover, after the optimisation process, the decision-maker eventually selects just one solution for deployment, regardless of how many high-quality, diverse solutions are available. In light of this, we argue an idea that under a very limited evaluation budget, it may be more useful to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
