TL;DR
This paper introduces DYPO, a unified framework that combines SFT and RL for large language models, effectively balancing bias and variance to improve reasoning and out-of-distribution performance.
Contribution
DYPO integrates group alignment loss, multi-teacher distillation, and dynamic gating to mitigate bias-variance conflict in LLM training, advancing beyond naive loss weighting strategies.
Findings
DYPO reduces reasoning benchmark errors by 4.8%.
DYPO improves out-of-distribution task performance by 13.3%.
Theoretical analysis confirms bias reduction and variance minimization.
Abstract
Post-training paradigms for Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), face a fundamental dilemma: SFT provides stability (low variance) but suffers from high fitting bias, while RL enables exploration (low bias) but grapples with high gradient variance. Existing unified optimization strategies often employ naive loss weighting, overlooking the statistical conflict between these distinct gradient signals. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of this bias-variance trade-off and propose \textbf{DYPO} (Dynamic Policy Optimization), a unified framework designed to structurally mitigate this conflict. DYPO integrates three core components: (1) a \textit{Group Alignment Loss (GAL)} that leverages intrinsic group dynamics to significantly reduce RL gradient variance; (2) a \textit{Multi-Teacher Distillation}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
