A Mathematical Framework for Temporal Modeling and Counterfactual Policy Simulation of Student Dropout
Rafael da Silva, Jeff Eicher, Gregory Longo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a temporal modeling framework with counterfactual policy simulation for student dropout, leveraging LMS engagement data and administrative records to evaluate intervention impacts.
Contribution
It presents a novel mathematical framework combining time-to-event modeling with counterfactual policy analysis for dropout prevention.
Findings
Model achieves high predictive accuracy with AUCs around 0.84.
Scenario simulations reveal potential survival benefits under specific policies.
Performance is sensitive to feature set composition, emphasizing temporal engagement signals.
Abstract
This study proposes a temporal modeling framework with a counterfactual policy-simulation layer for student dropout in higher education, using LMS engagement data and administrative withdrawal records. Dropout is operationalized as a time-to-event outcome at the enrollment level; weekly risk is modeled in discrete time via penalized, class-balanced logistic regression over person--period rows. Under a late-event temporal holdout, the model attains row-level AUCs of 0.8350 (train) and 0.8405 (test), with aggregate calibration acceptable but sparsely supported in the highest-risk bins. Ablation analyses indicate performance is sensitive to feature set composition, underscoring the role of temporal engagement signals. A scenario-indexed policy layer produces survival contrasts under an explicit trigger/schedule contract: positive contrasts are confined to the shock branch…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
