The Illusion of Learning from Observational Data: An Empirical Bayes Perspective
Bohan Wu, Sebastian Salazar, Donald P. Green, and David M. Blei

TL;DR
This paper proposes an empirical Bayes approach to assess and correct for biases in observational studies by using calibration experiments with known zero effects, improving causal inference.
Contribution
It introduces a method to learn the distribution of observational biases from calibration studies, enabling more accurate causal estimates from observational data.
Findings
Bias distribution can be consistently estimated with more calibration studies.
Empirical Bayes shrinkage improves causal effect estimation.
Simulation and semi-synthetic examples demonstrate method effectiveness.
Abstract
Randomized experiments have long been the gold standard for scientists seeking to learn about cause and effect. When randomized experiments are infeasible, scientists often resort to observational studies, which are widely available and often large but rely on untestable assumptions that, when violated, may result in biased estimates. Uncertainty about bias leads to a phenomenon known as the illusion of learning from observational research (Gerber, Green and Kaplan, 2004a): absent prior information about bias, observational results cannot meaningfully contribute to the estimation of a causal parameter. To shatter the illusion, we take an empirical Bayes perspective. We show that the distribution of observational biases can be learned from calibration studies-experiments that target a causal effect that is known a priori to be zero. Calibration identifies the distribution of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
